Syvecs Forums

Yes if you're trying to do a blip function on something like a Hawkeye Subaru with DBW throttle, then you probably want to trigger the blip with NPS and clutch switch, and perhaps the brake too if you want you will need to test it to find the best combination. But to share the input with the cut fun...

What will be easier is if you tell us what you're trying to do, and then we can suggest the best way to do it, or if you're trying to do something "unwise". There are currently no general purpose software functions or rules that can be brought into play. The blip function is derived from racing car ...

Yes and no. Generally not but you can share an input for the task you want to do. You need to set the "Cut Input Polarity" and "Blip input Polarity" opposite from each other so they reflect the action of the strain gauge. Usually you would have a strain gauge lever sat with the output at say 2.5volt...

That sounds fine. You'll need to remember that the definition for the gap position is effectively in degrees ATDC, and the reference angle refers to the tooth after the gap, rather than the tooth that concludes the gap. The manual cam checklist is certainly the way to do it, but it's a pain to set u...

I was thinking of the RWD GTR with Tractive sequential box, Motec ECU mapped by Dave Rowe, but perhaps I've got my cars mixed up? In terms of logging, you could use the GEMS logger easily as it's CANBUS is fully configurable, as is the Racelogic video vbox pro. The AIM Sports logger is not 100% conf...

It's not especially critical on a 36-1 or 60-2 setup. However the relative position of the cam position can be critical if you're using a "keyed by single cam" setup as you don't want the trigger edge to be very close to a crank trigger edge (so that it might be either side of it in some conditions)...

Hi Chris, First of all what an awesome car you have! It would be nice to get an S8C on it :) That aside the S8C will at least give you 8 times the data of the M800 but it also comes with many more engine parameters to log, especially if you are still developing the engine package, so the overall gai...

You need to work on the "Manifold Pressure Error Demand" table, not the Integral table. An integral correction IS slow (relatively), because it is time based by its very nature, and in this case it is linked to the Manifold Pressure Error Demand output. It is this "Manifold Pressure Error Demand" ta...

You don't get me. The default base WG duty table is not the wrong way around. YOUR table is the wrong way around. If you're phase duty is set correctly, you should get increasing boost with increasing WG duty. With your current setup the strategy will not properly, you need to double check the opera...

Well the first thing you need to check is that you phase duty table is how you want it. I would guess that it currently is backwards which is used if you plumb the valve differently. Your base WG duty table should be higher where the boost is below target and lower where the boost is above target. A...